![]() ![]() I also have to mention the DJM 800, since it ruled for so long and was so popular, I still play on it very commonly. Who is the current reigning champion you wonder? There is no argument, it’s the DJM 900 nexus (and slightly newer NXS2). The DJM nexus 2000 probably being too excessive to be common, and the DDM400 just being made by Behringer. However much I like these two DJ mixers, I gotta say I have yet to encounter either this past few years of extensive playing and travel to gigs. It’s like the Ferrari of DJ mixers to me, if you spend the time to explore it enough to actually use it deeply, it’s pretty crazy, a contender for most features on a DJ mixer surely. ![]() The club I am a resident at, called Gorg-O-Mish after-hours in Vancouver, has the much more costly Pioneer DJM-2000 nexus installed in the booth, and this mixer and me have become quite familiar with each other over the past couple years. I personally love it and bought it at an unbelievably low price for what it does, all my recent studio mixes are recorded on it. I ignore the on-board loop sampler because it’s 20. Before you judge on the Behringer name, this mixer isn’t as well known as it’s lamer DJX counterparts, and is more akin to the digital studio line of Behringer mixers, with crisp 24bit digital sound and two very powerful efx processors, assignable to any channels including doubling them up, and save-able user settings to jump to my best efx, filter settings for mixes. In my studio currently I am using the Behringer DDM400, upgraded with the Infinitum X1 optical cross-fader (of course). However, as a long-time working DJ on the club and underground party circuit, I have noticed that you encounter a much smaller range of mixers at gigs, and that’s where the performance you might have worked out in your own music space really counts. The DJ mixer market has many options in any price range, any size, across a multitude of popular (and unpopular) brands. Far outnumbering audio players like CDJs or turntables, and possibly controllers as well, (but they are catching up). ![]() I was thinking of modifying the spec file to remove the db4 requirement, but I'm not sure of the implications of that, or how to even do that properly.As any DJ out there probably already knows, the internet offers no shortage of articles and reviews about DJ mixers. Do I just have to cut my losses and deploy a CentOS 6 box? It seems that CentOS 6 still has db4. I'm not really sure how to proceed at this point. Warning: db4-4.7.86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID c105b9de: NOKEYĭb4 < 5 is obsoleted by (installed) libdb-5.3.86_64 Trying to install db4 fails too because the the Berkely DB version 5 is already installed and in use on CentOS 7: # rpm -iv db4-4.7.86_64.rpm ![]() I've tried downloading and installing db4-devel, but that has it's own dependencies that I can't meet: # rpm -iv db4-devel-4.7.86_64.rpm Im attempting to build apr-utils-1.6.1 from source on CentOS 7 (with the goal to get httpd-2.4.29) but I'm stuck with a dependancy issue: # rpmbuild -tb apr-util-1.6.1.tar.bz2ĭb4-devel is needed by apr-util-1.6.1-1.x86_64ĭb4-devel isn't available in yum and libdb-devel provides version 5, which doesn't meet the dependency requirement. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |